[[ Read ]] Landscape Turned Red: The Battle of Antietam Author Stephen W Sears – Andy-palmer.co.uk

Landscape Turned Red: The Battle of Antietam OMG Stephen W Sears book about Antietam entitled, Landscape Turned Red, must be in the book collection of every American Civil War buff The book details everything leading up to the battle at Antietam and shows how stupid the Generals of the Union Army were I honestly believe that it was the ignorance of so many of these Union Generals that caused the war to last a long as it did Confederate General Robert E Lee so understood the timidness and overly cautious attitude of Northern General George B McClellan, that he simply toyed or played with him The book shows Lee s strategy completely understood that Union Generals would not attack and if they did and even had won a skirmish, that they would retreat and not follow up their victory President Lincoln was frustrated that he could not find a general to fight on as he said The book tells how McClellan and his replacements botched everything leading up to Antietam and every that battle itself It wasn t until Grant, Sheridan, Sherman and Meade emerged that the Union finally saw the war begin to turn in its favor Landscape Turned Red filled in my knowledge of this great American Tragedy. I ve read many battle accounts, and this is the first one that I can recall reading about a Civil War battle.Its reputation as a military history is well deserved Sears tells well the maneuvering of the forces, starting with the battles around South Mountain, and through the main fight at Antietam He includes a broad array of perspectives Union and Confederate, generals and soldiers, military men and a few civilians Sears provides a lot of grim details about casualties, and perhaps rightfully so, as the man fight at Antietam was a bloody battle, the bloodiest day in American military history.A constant theme of the book is McClellan and his failings his hesitations, his overestimation of enemy strength, his lack of coordination throughout the battle This is all true and probably warranted, especially considering the casualties involved, and the facts speak for themselves All the reason, perhaps, that Sears s judgmental tone becomes grating I certainly enjoy playing armchair general maybe I didn t appreciate it so much from a historian, who is supposed to be fair and balanced There was a point at which the author s analysis crossed over into personal attacks on McClellan, which seemed un historian, if not also a tad bit unfair to his subject.Balancing that, perhaps, is Sears s treatment of Lee Sears doesn t exaggerate or fawn over the success of Lee s generalship at Antietam Rather, Lee is portrayed here as shrewd, the consummate poker player, who consistently and quite accurately assesses his opponent Their fighting in the Peninsular Campaign, which Sears touches upon in the beginning, gave Lee this insight By positioning his army with his back to a river, the Potomac, Lee seemed to be daring McClellan To what higher end, though, isn t entirely clear The Maryland Campaign didn t seem to depend on the outcome at Antietam, and soon after the battle, Lee s army escaped, which arguably they may have done sooner, with fewer casualties.Sears discusses the fallout of the battle, especially surrounding his Macbeth, McClellan The Maryland Campaign did fail in Lee s ultimate intent of inciting Maryland to join the Confederacy, so in that sense McClellan s fight can t be called a total failure yet, as Sears reiterates, it also wasn t the glorious victory McClellan claimed it to be The truth is somewhere in the middle, but what that blood soaked truth is, Sears doesn t say or I missed it Arguably, and tragically, Antietam may have had no real military or strategic purpose, or it may have been a mistake, as it was kind of a draw.Throughout, Sears relies on archival research to build his story Diaries, letters, and unit histories stand out Even so, Sears leave some points hanging why, for example, was the Union commander Couch so slow It s not clear if this was never covered in the historical record, and for as many times as Sears brings it up, as a sort of mystery, it might have been beneficial to acknowledge why that wasn t investigated or questioned since To be fair, it s quite possible that I may have missed that footnote among the many that strengthen Sears s assault, which is focused on Little Mac and the other Union generals.For readers who may be unfamiliar with this type if work, it s important to point that Sears doesn t provide context on some points that would help a modern reader understand the big picture For example, he doesn t relate why Civil War fighting like this was so vicious to most readers of this kind of work, it isn t necessary If you are looking for that kind of broader context, or a fuller account involving civilian perspectives, logistics, or political analysis, you ll need to read other works Perhaps this account could have benefited those kinds of details, but this is a military history, and specifically a battle account, first and foremost In that, it s as fine, and as limited, as any of its kind. Combining Brilliant Military Analysis With Rich Narrative History, Landscape Turned Red Is The Definitive Work On The Battle Of AntietamThe Civil War Battle Waged On September At Antietam Creek, Maryland, Was One Of The Bloodiest In The Nation S History On This Single Day, The War Claimed Nearly , Casualties Here Renowned Historian Stephen Sears Draws On A Remarkable Cache Of Diaries, Dispatches, And Letters To Recreate The Vivid Drama Of Antietam As Experienced Not Only By Its Leaders But Also By Its Soldiers, Both Union And Confederate, To Produce What The New York Times Book Review Has Called The Best Account Of The Battle Of Antietam


About the Author: Stephen W Sears

Is a well-known author, some of his books are a fascination for readers like in the Landscape Turned Red: The Battle of Antietam book, this is one of the most wanted Stephen W Sears author readers around the world.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *